CONSTRUCTION RESOLUTION INTELLIGENCE REPORT · $6,500–$32,000
Developer corporate health, project completion analysis, cost-to-complete estimate, priority waterfall, and three-scenario resolution economics. Everything you need to decide: fund completion, appoint a receiver, or exit the file. Delivered in 5–7 days.
CARRY ON A $5M FILE
$50,000–$58,000/month
at 12–14% annual rate
18-MONTH RECEIVERSHIP COST
$900,000–$1,050,000
total carry burned waiting
CRI-2 PAYBACK PERIOD
11 days
of avoided carry
RECEIVERSHIP TIMELINE
12–24 months
from application to discharge
What You Receive
20–40 page PDF with executive summary
Branded, committee-ready, fully cited
Developer corporate intelligence
Corporate registry, principals, track record, litigation, PPSA, financial stress signals, settlement propensity
Related entity discovery
Other companies controlled by the same principals — their receiverships, their defaults, their construction liens
Project and title analysis with completion assessment
Permit status, completion %, cost-to-complete with confidence band, completed asset value, priority waterfall, equity position
Completion economics
Fund completion vs. as-is sale, break-even analysis, monthly carry burn
3 resolution scenarios with specific dollar amounts
Negotiate / receivership / accelerated exit — NPV ranked, sub-options modeled
Strategic recommendations with conflict detection
Recommended path, fallback if developer won't cooperate, timeline triggers
Addendum B: Corporate Stress Score and Resolution Window
Corporate health intelligence — draw patterns, litigation density, creditor pressure, macro conditions
How It Works
Developer name, property address, project type, completion status, draw schedule if available, outstanding balance, known liens. Construction-specific intake fields appear automatically.
Corporate registry. Municipal permits. CanLII litigation. PPSA. Construction liens. Cost-to-complete benchmarks. Comparable completed sales.
Our pipeline automatically discovers related entities controlled by the same principals — other projects, other receiverships, other defaults. If your developer's directors are running a second company that's already in distress, we find it.
A committee-ready PDF with developer intelligence, completion economics, three resolution scenarios ranked by NPV, and a Corporate Stress Score with Resolution Window estimate. Ready for your committee, your counsel, or your receivership application.
What Makes DataStars Different
No other firm scores your developer's corporate distress signals and maps them against the resolution timeline. This is what ships with every DataStars construction product.
SAMPLE OUTPUT · RESIDENTIAL INFILL DEVELOPER · PEEL REGION
Resolution Window
6 months
Estimated time before developer's capacity to negotiate
or contribute collapses entirely.
⚠️ Floor applied: active receivership detected. Component-weighted score overridden to minimum 0.70.
Included at every tier — from a $6,500 Construction Snapshot to a $32,000 Litigation Package. Contact us to learn more about our methodology.
Case Study
THE SITUATION
A private lender holds collateral security on a residential infill project in Peel Region. The detached home is approximately 90% complete. Construction has stopped. The developer is not responding to requests for a completion plan.
THE INTELLIGENCE
The Construction Resolution Intelligence report reveals the developer's related entity is in receivership with $90M+ in secured debt across multiple development sites — same directors, same registered office. The municipality has drawn $8.3M from the developer's securities on a separate subdivision due to non-completion. An $81K construction lien from an unpaid drywall subcontractor is registered on the property — confirming unpaid trades and statutory holdback exposure that affects the priority waterfall. Corporate Stress Score: 0.70 (floor applied — active receivership detected). Three resolution scenarios modeled: negotiation ($657K NPV), accelerated exit ($613K NPV), continued receivership ($161K NPV).
THE OUTCOME
The lender funds the remaining 10% of construction through the receiver at a cost of $89K. The completed home sells to the existing pre-sale purchaser. Total recovery: $755K — versus $265K net after 18 months of continued receivership fees and carry. The CRI-2 cost $18,500. The intelligence saved $490K and 16 months.
Anonymized case study based on publicly available Ontario court records.
Methodology
Corporate Stress Scores are calculated from six weighted components: draw pattern analysis (30%), litigation density (20%), PPSA creditor pressure (15%), principal concentration risk (15%), annual return currency (10%), and Ontario construction sector conditions (10%).
Scores include a receivership floor — a developer in active receivership cannot score below 0.70, regardless of other signals.
Cost-to-complete estimates use Statistics Canada and Altus Group benchmarks with confidence bands calibrated to data quality (±10% to ±30%). Every figure carries a disclaimer distinguishing it from quantity surveyor opinions and AACI-certified values.
Request a methodology call →Pricing
CRI-1 · SNAPSHOT
$6,500
Developer intel + title + basic waterfall
24–48 hours
Need a quick read before committing to a full engagement? Start with a Snapshot.
CRI-2 · RESOLUTION INTELLIGENCE
$18,500
Full report — all 8 sections + Addendum B
5–7 days
OPTION A — COMMIT
$15,725
Pay in full — 15% discount
OPTION B — CONFIDENCE
$4,625
now + $13,875 on delivery
CRI-3 · LITIGATION PACKAGE
$32,000
CRI-2 + damages quantification + AACI certification
7–14 days
Headed to court? Add AACI certification and damages quantification. CUSPAP-compliant, Rule 53 ready.
Start with a Snapshot if you need a quick read on the developer before committing to a full engagement. All CRI-1 research feeds directly into CRI-2 — you never pay for the same research twice.
FAQ
Also Holding Residential POS Files?
The same platform handles your entire distressed book. Settlement Intelligence Reports for residential enforcement, Construction Resolution Intelligence for stalled development loans. One intake, one relationship, one consistent framework.